Jroc
Aug 16 2007, 11:58 AM
I am in the process of revising the handicap formula we use for our local minis. Currently, I take the best 10 rounds from each players most recent 20, subtract 48 (what would be considered a 'scratch' score) to come up with the handicap. Also, if you dont have a handicap...you basically 'donate' that first week to establish.
We started doing handicaps in August '06 after collecting scores dating back to May '05. Statistically I think it is very accurate, but a few problems have arisen. The formula really doesnt work until you get more than 10 rounds. Even after over 2 years worth of data has been collected on 112 players, less than 20% of the players have at least 20 rounds and maybe 50% have at least 10 rounds. Also, a lot of our regulars are in that 'Intermediate' class and still throw inconsistantly. If their first few rounds are pretty high scores (due to high wind, bagging, or just sucking that day)...then, they play casually with peeps for a few months scoring relativly well, then show up to a mini and cream those same peeps with a handicap that is not indicative of their playing ability. I know that kind of thing can happen no matter what formula you use...but there has to be a better way for use to go about it.
Even with some of the complaints...there are more people coming out to play the minis than ever before. Our players dont want to do away with the handicaps, but they would like something a little more accurate. I understand that with handicaps, its all about you verses yourself...but I can see what they are saying, so I am looking for a different formula.
I think I am going to start with just the most recent 5 rounds averaged, then subtract 48...or maybe the last 10 and weight the most recent 3 more than the previous 7. What are some formulas that you guys use?
We started doing handicaps in August '06 after collecting scores dating back to May '05. Statistically I think it is very accurate, but a few problems have arisen. The formula really doesnt work until you get more than 10 rounds. Even after over 2 years worth of data has been collected on 112 players, less than 20% of the players have at least 20 rounds and maybe 50% have at least 10 rounds. Also, a lot of our regulars are in that 'Intermediate' class and still throw inconsistantly. If their first few rounds are pretty high scores (due to high wind, bagging, or just sucking that day)...then, they play casually with peeps for a few months scoring relativly well, then show up to a mini and cream those same peeps with a handicap that is not indicative of their playing ability. I know that kind of thing can happen no matter what formula you use...but there has to be a better way for use to go about it.
Even with some of the complaints...there are more people coming out to play the minis than ever before. Our players dont want to do away with the handicaps, but they would like something a little more accurate. I understand that with handicaps, its all about you verses yourself...but I can see what they are saying, so I am looking for a different formula.
I think I am going to start with just the most recent 5 rounds averaged, then subtract 48...or maybe the last 10 and weight the most recent 3 more than the previous 7. What are some formulas that you guys use?