20460chase
Jul 16 2007, 02:27 PM
I think something that needs to be addressed is the PDGAs handling of who is allowed to run a sanctioned event.
As it is, IMO, there is already too many tourneys out there. That being beside the point, my problem is the PDGA allowing anyone that can fill out a form to run an event.
I played an event 2 weeks ago that was a total joke. The guy had no idea how things were supposed to be handled and a local club had to show up and bail him out by providing prizes and payout to all the amatuer divisions, on top of that, he had to use the Ace fund in order to pay out the Pro players.
I dont place all the fault on the TD. He doesnt know dick and has played rec in 2 tournaments, yet felt qualified to run an event. I put blame onto the PDGA for not insuring this guy knew what the hell was going on. I dont think he was out to do anything but run the tourney ( for which I was told he was doing so for a credit for one of his classes ) but it put the PDGA into a questionable light as to why they feel the need to put as many events as possible into the calendar.
Maybe Im off base here, if so, I apologize, but I think the PDGA needs to step it up a bit and figure out who people are and why these tourneys are being run.
Personally, I think you should have to qualify to run a PDGA event. Granted, most tourneys I go to are well run, but they are also established events. If your a 1st timer w/ no proven track record, you shouldnt be given that right. I dont even understand how the TD could have passed an Officials test, let alone been given the right to run a PDGA event.
Actually, I do understand how he may have passed the test. Im told a room full of cigarette smoking monkeys given a typewriter and enough time could produce novels...perhaps he only hired one monkey. I think that and a rule book would make it possible.
As it is, IMO, there is already too many tourneys out there. That being beside the point, my problem is the PDGA allowing anyone that can fill out a form to run an event.
I played an event 2 weeks ago that was a total joke. The guy had no idea how things were supposed to be handled and a local club had to show up and bail him out by providing prizes and payout to all the amatuer divisions, on top of that, he had to use the Ace fund in order to pay out the Pro players.
I dont place all the fault on the TD. He doesnt know dick and has played rec in 2 tournaments, yet felt qualified to run an event. I put blame onto the PDGA for not insuring this guy knew what the hell was going on. I dont think he was out to do anything but run the tourney ( for which I was told he was doing so for a credit for one of his classes ) but it put the PDGA into a questionable light as to why they feel the need to put as many events as possible into the calendar.
Maybe Im off base here, if so, I apologize, but I think the PDGA needs to step it up a bit and figure out who people are and why these tourneys are being run.
Personally, I think you should have to qualify to run a PDGA event. Granted, most tourneys I go to are well run, but they are also established events. If your a 1st timer w/ no proven track record, you shouldnt be given that right. I dont even understand how the TD could have passed an Officials test, let alone been given the right to run a PDGA event.
Actually, I do understand how he may have passed the test. Im told a room full of cigarette smoking monkeys given a typewriter and enough time could produce novels...perhaps he only hired one monkey. I think that and a rule book would make it possible.