In the 2004 Bull City Showdown, Nov. 20-21, 2004, one of the courses played is listed as Cornwall Park in Bellingham, WA. Durham, NC is known as the "Bull City", and the course played was "Cornwallis Park"

Found another mistake, which is not completely ratings related...

2004 Outlaws Singles Shootout.
My Round 2 score is incorrect. I shot a 74, not a 64. When I left the course I thought I DFL'ed, but it looks like someone else missed holes or quit.

yes something must be wrong with mine too. it is going the wrong way. only 1 more point!! :D/msgboard/images/graemlins/smirk.gif

In the 2004 Bull City Showdown, Nov. 20-21, 2004, one of the courses played is listed as Cornwall Park in Bellingham, WA. Durham, NC is known as the "Bull City", and the course played was "Cornwallis Park"



Chuck... are we going to fix this ?

Yeah Chuck, this is going to make a big difference in the Ratings.

It's been reported to Roger for correction in the May update.

Hey chuck,
Our event this last weekend here in ST louis was played on a brand new configuration that plays about 4 strokes harder than before from the short pins and 7-8 strokes harder from the long placements at both jb and Endicott plus it was really windy at JB on sunday.
How do all of the new changes get incorporated into the ratings already?
I believe the Ratings were based on our old WCP.
The course is much harder than any previous configuration by a long shot.
The 53 at JB should have been well over 1020

Change those 777 rounds to 999 for the online posting. The online software hasn't been updated to ignore those rounds in the calculations. Leave the 777 in the TD report sent to the PDGA though.

there is a mistake in the new WIndy Water open results from last weekend. the intermnediates played the short tees while the pros and advanced played long tees the 2nd round. Though it is kind of funny seeing every intermediate shooting rounds over 1000

Any mistakes in unofficial ratings need to be directed to the TD to fix. And, just because the online results are incorrect doesn't necessarily mean the TD hasn't submitted the course layouts correctly on the TD report.

Just noticed a mistake from last year's PFDO. check out the ratings of the Advanced Grandmasters:

http://www.pdga.com/tournament/tournament_results.php?TournID=4013&year=2005&include_ratings=1#Masters

Nothing looks abnormal. If you look at the Course Stats for that event, some divisions played different sets of tees in R2 and R3 than other divisions. Apparently, the Adv GMs played the same as GM Pro.

I'm sure they didn't. They would have shot 85-100 if they had.

Besides, look at the round ratings. Don't you think it weird that they averaged over 100 points above their rating for those rounds?

I'll pass it to Roger to check the TD report for course assignments. I didn't do that one so I don't have the file.

Any word on an expected date for the 1st quarter 2005 ratings update? :cool:

Chuck, when is the next Update?


mid-May. Looking at the calendar, I'm estimating Monday, May 23rd since the 15th is on a Sunday.

See Ratings Update thread