PDGA Discussion Board - View Single Post

cgkdisc · May 20 2012, 08:22 AM

Requiring higher minimum number of propagators for events to be included and playing at least 3 rounds would be better ways to improve the quality of the ratings generated for global events. If certain locations pay into the global purse and don't meet the criteria, you just rebate their entry fees for their global not their local competition. That way the ratings for every site and player are calculated the same way and you can handle still new courses or temp courses where there's no data to adjust things as you propose.

May 20 2012, 08:22 AM	#3160
cgkdisc PDGA Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota Posts: 6,220	Requiring higher minimum number of propagators for events to be included and playing at least 3 rounds would be better ways to improve the quality of the ratings generated for global events. If certain locations pay into the global purse and don't meet the criteria, you just rebate their entry fees for their global not their local competition. That way the ratings for every site and player are calculated the same way and you can handle still new courses or temp courses where there's no data to adjust things as you propose. __________________ Rater of the tossed arc.