Jeff_LaG
Mar 04 2008, 02:05 PM
Four players came out on an unseasonably warm March morning to fight for the #1 tag on the uber-challenging Quaker's Challenge course. Phil came out on top once again and grabbed the coveted prize.
Monday's Tag Results:
Layout: all A pins except for #3B
Phil Denhardt - #2 - 62 - #1
Paul Wojcik - #3 - 66 - #2
Jeff LaGrassa - #1 - 67 - #3
Matt Hamilton - #11 - 69 - #11
<table border="2"><tr><th colspan=1> Layout </th><th> 1 </th><th> 2 </th><th> 3 </th><th> 4 </th><th> 5 </th><th> 6 </th><th> 7 </th><th> 8 </th><th> 9 </th><th> out </th><th> 10 </th><th> 11 </th><th> 12 </th><th> 13 </th><th> 14 </th><th> 15 </th><th> 16 </th><th> 17 </th><th> 18 </th><th> in </th><th> TOTAL </th></tr>
<tr><td> B pin on hole#3 </td><td> 242 </td><td> 409 </td><td> 795 </td><td> 300 </td><td> 250 </td><td> 333 </td><td> 450 </td><td> 587 </td><td> 313 </td><td> 3679 </td><td> 525 </td><td> 444 </td><td> 265 </td><td> 285 </td><td> 420 </td><td> 150 </td><td> 661 </td><td> 375 </td><td> 300 </td><td> 3425 </td><td> 7104 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Par </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 30 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 30 </td><td> 60 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Phil D. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 32 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 30 </td><td> 62 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Paul W. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 33 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 33 </td><td> 66 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Jeff L. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 2 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 2 </td><td> 32 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 35 </td><td> 67 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Matt H. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 37 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 32 </td><td> 69 </td></tr>
<tr><td> average hole score </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 3.5 </td><td> 5.5 </td><td> 2.75 </td><td> 3.25 </td><td> 4.0 </td><td> 4.5 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 2.75 </td><td> 33.5 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 3.25 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 3.5 </td><td> 4.0 </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 32.5 </td><td> 66.0 </td></tr>
</table>
Paul, you posted on the Boulder Woods Yahoo Group with regards to Sunday tags that par was 58. (par: 29+29=58) Where are you getting that from? One place I could see that is hole#8's A position is slightly shorter and to the left, but is still well protected and arguably still plays as a par 4. On the back nine, even to the A position on hole#10, I think the same applies. With the ~30 feet in elevation gain on the 444-ft. hole#11 and the extremely well protected pin, there's no question that one's clearly a pro par four. And at 661 ft. and with a tight approach to the pin, hole#16 also plays as a par four, imo. So I would say par 60: (30+30=60)
Monday's Tag Results:
Layout: all A pins except for #3B
Phil Denhardt - #2 - 62 - #1
Paul Wojcik - #3 - 66 - #2
Jeff LaGrassa - #1 - 67 - #3
Matt Hamilton - #11 - 69 - #11
<table border="2"><tr><th colspan=1> Layout </th><th> 1 </th><th> 2 </th><th> 3 </th><th> 4 </th><th> 5 </th><th> 6 </th><th> 7 </th><th> 8 </th><th> 9 </th><th> out </th><th> 10 </th><th> 11 </th><th> 12 </th><th> 13 </th><th> 14 </th><th> 15 </th><th> 16 </th><th> 17 </th><th> 18 </th><th> in </th><th> TOTAL </th></tr>
<tr><td> B pin on hole#3 </td><td> 242 </td><td> 409 </td><td> 795 </td><td> 300 </td><td> 250 </td><td> 333 </td><td> 450 </td><td> 587 </td><td> 313 </td><td> 3679 </td><td> 525 </td><td> 444 </td><td> 265 </td><td> 285 </td><td> 420 </td><td> 150 </td><td> 661 </td><td> 375 </td><td> 300 </td><td> 3425 </td><td> 7104 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Par </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 30 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 30 </td><td> 60 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Phil D. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 32 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 30 </td><td> 62 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Paul W. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 33 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 33 </td><td> 66 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Jeff L. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 2 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 2 </td><td> 32 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 35 </td><td> 67 </td></tr>
<tr><td> Matt H. </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 6 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 37 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 5 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 4 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 3 </td><td> 32 </td><td> 69 </td></tr>
<tr><td> average hole score </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 3.5 </td><td> 5.5 </td><td> 2.75 </td><td> 3.25 </td><td> 4.0 </td><td> 4.5 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 2.75 </td><td> 33.5 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 3.25 </td><td> 4.25 </td><td> 3.5 </td><td> 4.0 </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 3.0 </td><td> 32.5 </td><td> 66.0 </td></tr>
</table>
Paul, you posted on the Boulder Woods Yahoo Group with regards to Sunday tags that par was 58. (par: 29+29=58) Where are you getting that from? One place I could see that is hole#8's A position is slightly shorter and to the left, but is still well protected and arguably still plays as a par 4. On the back nine, even to the A position on hole#10, I think the same applies. With the ~30 feet in elevation gain on the 444-ft. hole#11 and the extremely well protected pin, there's no question that one's clearly a pro par four. And at 661 ft. and with a tight approach to the pin, hole#16 also plays as a par four, imo. So I would say par 60: (30+30=60)